The Workers' Statute speaks of their right to physical integrity and the prevention of occupational risks. It is striking, then, that in all these years there has not been legislation that explicitly contradicts what was adopted in the 1938 decree and that, therefore, the interpretation has been left to the discretion of the courts.
This is due to the fact that, since there were no explicit references to the decree, there remained doubts about its validity and, above all, whether the provisions then buy email database continued to be valid in the company of the 21st century. It can be seen that only in the Workers' Statute is there a tangential reference to the prevention of occupational hazards that could be associated with the provisions of the 1938 decree.
Eating outdoors and without taking shelter from inclement weather could mean a long-term problem and be considered an occupational hazard. Legislative development of this obligation Although the different judicial instances have made certain interpretations of the company's obligation, it has not disappeared because, in the end, it has been considered a labor right . None of the legislative resolutions.